![]() So I mount directly or as a bind mount some existing mounts from the server within the single NFS share, and with that "corssmnt" NFS export option the clients are be able to see those sub mounts within that NFS share. In my setup it works, I don't know what could cause this? Are you using the very same IP address or hostname to mount the NFS share at the client? I'm not using that scenario in my daily setup, but another thing I'm using all the times is "crossmnt" option at the server side. This is just an informative message to you guys because I tried to google this for some time and I didn't find any blogs or pages mentioning that user-space "copy_file_range" requirement in addition to the NFS v4.2. UPDATE: throwaway6560192 mentioned in the comments that copy_file_range is implement into KDE Framework 5.88 onwards: I hope they'll implement this in the future. ![]() This feature can still be easily disabled by using -reflink=never argument with cp command (in coreutils 9.0 cp command defaults to -reflink=auto: ).īut of course, other user-space file management/copying tools I'm using, like KDE's Dolphin and rsync don't support this. This is a significant performance gain in certain circumstances. So I compiled manually coreutils 9.0 on one of my Debian 11 NFS client machine and it works! Now if I copy something inside the NFS share (or from another NFS share to another, which are mounted from the same NFS server) the data gets copied on the NFS server locally and it's not round-tripping via the client anymore. Unfortunately, Ubuntu's and Debian's coreutils are still on v8.xx and they lack this functionality. And it seems that this feature has been recently added to coreutils' cp command (see: ) and it's available on coreutils v9.0 onwards. Then I was informed that it's not enough that shares are using NFSv4.2: the user-space tool that is used to copy the files needs to support "copy_file_range" syscall as well, to get the server-side copying to work properly. And the reason why I wanted NFSv4.2 was server-side copying feature, see: I think it's a killer feature, like reflinking over NFS (which, by the way works with BTRFS and XFS filesystems over NFS too!).īut even I had successfully set up the NFS v4.2, my copying tests (cp /mnt/nfs/src.file /mnt/nfs/dest.file) were indicating that the data is still round-tripping via the client. Copy and paste the link instead of clicking on it! Apparently that makes a difference.I have a Linux NFS server and clients (all are running Linux kernel 5.13 or higher) and I was able to set up network mounts by using the NFS version 4.2 (by using this guide here: ). So, Victoria 5 could only be used 'at most' with Daz Studio so far. Software like Poser can still load her with some plugins or exporting from Daz, but will lacks enhancements not supported in Poser, like SUBD. These could let morphs and movements smoother, without glitches or bumps (not requiring 'morphing fix' add-ons at all, like arms fix, thighs fix and so on). Finally, the mesh of Victoria 5 was updated and more smoother, with the use of SUBD, weight maps and optimisations nativelly to Daz Studio. Moreover, Genesis clothing will fit all genesis figures, not requiring a 'unimesh' morph. Daz claim 'Vicky' 5 has much more versatility due to the fact she can be anything (a male, a kid, even a gorilla). During the beta testing phases of DAZ Studio 4, there was released information briefly regarding the preparation of Victoria 5 as a part of Genesis. ![]() Version 5 of Victoria came in the end of 2011. Version 4.2 was released in February 2008 which added a set of built-in male morphs and further technical improvements. Version 4.1 was released in April 2007 and improved on the capability to load multiple sets of morphs into the character without causing conflicts. The mesh for Victoria 4.0 was developed using Luxology's modo. However morph injection for this figure was not initially available. The 4th generation of the figure began in December 2006 with the release of version 4.0 which included a new body shape and added several technical improvements to the figure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |